Saturday, October 13, 2007

Morales says U.S. soldiers should leave Bolivia




President Evo Morales said he expects U.S. military aid to Bolivia to stop soon, as his government plans to bar U.S. troops from assisting in anti-drug operations.

"Happily, it's ending," Morales told reporters at a news conference Tuesday night. "No foreigner in uniform will be operating here."

Bolivia is the world's No. 3 producer of cocaine, after Colombia and Peru. Washington last year provided US$91 million (€64 million) to help fight cocaine production and encourage Bolivian coca farmers to switch crops.

U.S. aid has paid for everything from Bolivian troops' uniforms to the gasoline in their trucks since the 1980s. But U.S. soldiers have not been directly involved in anti-narcotics efforts, leaving that task to U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration personnel and State Department contractors instead.

It's not clear if Morales would ban their involvement in Bolivian anti-drug efforts, too.

The U.S. Embassy had no immediate response to Morales' statement, and declined to say how many U.S. military personnel or contractors are now in Bolivia. The number is believed to be no more than a few dozen.

Morales, who allied himself with Cuba and Venezuela following his December 2005 election as Bolivia's first indigenous president, has spurned his country's traditionally close ties with the U.S. military.

While his government has supported efforts to halt cocaine exports, Morales, a former advocate for coca farmers, defends age-old medicinal and religious uses of the coca leaf, which is a mild stimulant when chewed or consumed as tea.

Morales also suggested on Tuesday that Bolivia's new constitution, now being drafted by a popularly elected assembly, should include a clause banning foreign military bases on Bolivian soil.

It's not clear how that rule would affect a handful of border military posts due to be built in Bolivia with Venezuelan aid, according to a military pact reached between Morales and President Hugo Chavez last year.

Columbus toppled as indigenous people rise up after five centuries

Explorer's reputation is victim of region's pink tide of leftwing governments

Rory Carroll in Caracas and Lola Almudevar in Sucre
Friday October 12, 2007
The Guardian


llustration of Christopher Columbus Arriving in the New World by T Sinclair
Victorian illustration by T Sinclair idealising Christopher Columbus' arrival in the New World. Photograph: PoodlesRock/Corbis


He had been sailing west for five weeks and sensed he was close when at 2am on October 12, with nothing but stars and moon to illuminate the waves, it was spotted: a dark lump ahead. Land. Christopher Columbus had reached the New World.

At sunrise he took a small boat and armed men to shore and planted a royal standard. With a solemn oath he took possession of the territory for the king and queen of Spain. Natives emerged from the trees and watched from a distance, puzzled. It was 1492.

More than five centuries later the anniversary of that event resounds with an ominous clang. Millions of people in central and South America lament that encounter in the Bahamas as the beginning of their ancestors' annihilation.

The indigenous inhabitants lost everything to the invaders: gold, land, freedom, culture, until there was almost nothing left. Disease and slaughter wiped most of them out. "It was a calamity," said Mark Horton, an archaeologist and Columbus expert at the University of Bristol.

Now, however, a counter-attack is under way. After centuries as underdogs, indigenous people are rising up - peacefully - to seize political power and assert their heritage.

The so-called pink tide of leftwing governments has surged on the back of indigenous movements intent on dismantling the region's eurocentric legacy - starting with Columbus.

Across the Andes the explorer once feted as a hero by the Europeanised elite is having his story rewritten, his statue toppled and his name turned to mud. Leading the assault is Venezuela's president, Hugo Chávez.

"They taught us to admire Christopher Columbus," he said during a recent televised address, his tone incredulous, while flicking through a 1970s school textbook. "In Europe they still speak of the 'discovery' of America and want us to celebrate the day."

Instead Mr Chávez has renamed October 12 "indigenous resistance day" and mounted a campaign against colonial residue. Textbooks are to be revised under a curriculum that will stress the opposition to Spanish conquest as doomed but heroic.

This week the president, who boasts of having an indigenous grandmother, renamed the cable car system which soars over Caracas, the capital, as Warairarepano, which means big mountain in an indigenous coastal tongue.

"For Chávez this is a natural cause because of his philosophy about the mistreatment of the downtrodden and the need for redress," said Larry Birns, of the Council on Hemispheric Affairs thinktank.

City authorities confirmed this week that a bronze Columbus statue which activists toppled from a Caracas plaza three years ago will remain under wraps. Repairs were almost complete but it would not return to its plinth because the site had been renamed: Avenue Columbus is now Avenue Indigenous Resistance. The statue is expected to go to a museum.

In contrast, a statue of María Lionza, a legendary indigenous queen who is the subject of a thriving cult, has been prominently restored. Last night thousands of devotees made their way to the holy mountain of Sorte for an annual festival which honours her and an indigenous chief and black slave killed by the Spanish.

Rehabilitated

Scholars tend to assign Columbus a walk-on part in history as the one who opened the New World door but had little role in the bloody aftermath. "He was part of a process that was inevitable, of Europe coming into contact with the wider world," said Dr Horton. "It's mistaken to see him as a totem of the bad guys. He actually wasn't too bad."

It has been a rollercoaster reputation. A dispute with Spain's king and queen landed Columbus in chains and disgrace. The Victorians rehabilitated him as an inspiration for their own explorers, a valiant image which largely endures in the west. Spain hopes DNA analysis will prove he came from Castille, while Italy hopes to confirm he was Genoese.

The 500th anniversary in 1992 prompted debate in the US about whether he should be recast as a villain but the controversy petered out, leaving the navigator a bruised but still revered figure. US schoolchildren get the day off on what remains Columbus Day.

In South America, however, radical leftwing governments in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela are busy overturning what they see as his legacy: centuries of domination by Spaniards and their descendants, pale-skinned elites who continued oppressing darker compatriots even after the continent gained independence.

"Even now they conceive us as animals, as dogs. That has got to change, which is what we are fighting for - to be recognised as equal citizens with equal rights," said Wilber Flores, a congressman and president of Bolivia's indigenous parliament.

In Venezuela Mr Chávez enshrined indigenous rights in a new constitution and made the country's 35 tribes visible through state-funded TV stations which broadcast from regions barely known to city-dwellers.

In Ecuador President Rafael Correa, who often wears traditional dress and speaks in Quechua, has rallied indigenous voters behind his effort to "reinvent" the country along socialist lines.

President Evo Morales, an Aymara Indian and Bolivia's first indigenous leader, has also fused indigenous rights with a socialist agenda hostile to Washington. He regards the US as the latest manifestation of a predatory colonialism that started in 1492. Last month it voted against a United Nations declaration on indigenous rights.

Rapacious

Mr Morales has accused the US of raiding Bolivia's natural resources and persecuting coca farmers as cocaine producers when in fact they are cultivating a plant that has had other, innocent, uses since the Incas.

He will mark the anniversary of Columbus's landing with a visit to the coca growing region of Chapare, which is playing host to a summit of indigenous people from across Latin America.

In an interview with the Guardian the Bolivian leader suggested the rapacious intruders who crossed an ocean thirsting for riches, and those who later invented capitalism, should have been studying, not conquering, the natives.

"Indigenous communities know how to live in harmony with mother earth and that is the difference between us and Europe and the United States."

Colombia’s Rural Social Movement Defies Government Intimidation and Comes Out to March

The Peasant-Farmer and Indigenous Mobilizations that Have Shaken the Country Since Yesterday Faced Intense Legal and Military Repression Before they Even Started
Laura del Castillo

In today’s zombie Colombia, made up of President Uribe’s friends and allies, everything seems to be right on track. It is a country of opportunities, where the government’s policy of “Democratic Security” has led to a time when there is no “armed conflict,” just a struggle against “terrorism.” Where there is nothing but smooth sailing ahead for the economy thanks to the high presence of foreign corporations. Where the country is free of paramilitaries because they have all demobilized and the drug war is hitting the traffickers where it hurts.

Nevertheless, on the other side – in that country that doesn’t figure among the pink-colored fantasies of Uribe’s activists – things are different, especially in rural areas. Most of the land is concentrated in the hands of big landowners, killings of rural leaders are again on the rise, the fumigations of illicit crops are destroying the food crops of the poor and affecting entire communities’ health, healthcare services are essentially privatized, and the “demobilized” paramilitaries have allied themselves with common criminals and now call themselves “Black Eagles” to sew terror in the most marginalized parts of the country. As they say, everything rises in that other part of the country: the cost of food, the cost of utilities, and, of course, the repression, because in a perfect country, no one contradicts the established order and protesting means committing a crime.

But a large part of that “other side” of the country is not staying silent. It is outraged and tired of enduring more than five years of attacks, humiliation and exclusion. That is why several diverse rural, indigenous, labor and student organizations in the country – who have come together to form the National Coordination of Agrarian and Popular Organizations of Colombia – began their National Agrarian and Popular Mobilization yesterday, with protest actions throughout the country. Marches, road blockades, office takeovers and land occupations are being carried out in villages, towns and cities.

During the weeks preceding the protest, the government unleashed an unprecedented wave of repression. Yes, that same democratic government (which supposedly respects the right to protest), amid its constant paranoia, has declared war on the mobilization. It has used many different strategies to demoralize the mobilization’s leaders and participants, including defamation, stigmatization, threats, unjustified arrests and murder. These attacks have made it clear that in Colombia, respect for differences and social protest is little more than a joke.

Protesting as a Crime
Since the first rumblings of the mobilization began to be heard, the government has waged a quiet war on the organizations involved. Organizers tried to keep plans secret for as long as possible, meeting infrequently in sites announced at the last minute. But by mid-September, the cat was out of the bag. On September 19, soldiers began distributing flyers and dropping them from the sky onto rural villages in Planadas, Tolima, about 200 miles southeast of Bogotá.

“Don’t participate in acts of terrorism,” the flyers read. “Don’t let them keep using you as cannon-fodder. Don’t go to the mobilization that the FARC is going to hold. Don’t become an accomplice to terrorists and murderers.”

Around the same time, say organizers, men identifying themselves as “Black Eagles” (the mysterious new extreme right-wing armed group that seems to be picking up where the now-demobilized United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, or AUC, left off) began appearing around the department, threatening punishment upon anyone who joined the planned protests.

But the first major blow came 10 days later, when agents of the DAS secret police, accompanied by dozens of armed soldiers, raided the offices of the Peasant Farmer Association of the Cimitarra River Valley (ACVC) and imprisoned three of its leaders. The ACVC is one of the most dynamic and powerful peasant organizations in the country. It has in the past rarely worked together with the National Federation of Agricultural Farming Unions (FENSUAGRO ), the agrarian workers’ union responsible for much of the mobilization’s organizing, and their collaboration on this has been something of a breakthrough for the rural social movement.

After the arrests, army chief General Mario Montoya Uribe appeared on television and spoke to local newspaper Vanguardia Liberal , announcing that the arrested men were FARC operatives and that he had 18 more similar warrants to serve. “We are investigating the behavior and conduct of many people,” he told the newspaper, “so there may be more people captured.” In the following days, residents of the nearby village of Yondó, Antioquia, reported the army was threatening to burn the houses of farmers who participated in the mobilization.

On October 2, in Cauca department – long a hotbed of indigenous and rural resistance – the local government declared that “in northern Cauca, the FARC have declared an armed stoppage, and those who participate in the mobilization will do so side-by-side with the Jacobo Arenas Mobile Column of the FARC.” Three days later, unidentified armed men took El Caraqueño village president Carlos Alberto Urbano off a bus and shot him in front of all the other passengers, including his wife and son.

Urbano died several days later while being transported to another hospital. Oscar Salazar, a community leader from La Vega, Cauca, and one of the national mobilization’s organizers, called him one of the mobilization’s “first victims” and saw the assassination as a clear paramilitary attack on the protest.

“We are social organizations, popular organizations, who are using our constitutional right to protest,” said Salazar. “But as it is a protest criticizing the Uribe regime, this is the way that they attack us, creating the conditions to annihilate the leaders and strike hard at the organizations and communities.”

The next day, back in Planadas, Tolima, soldiers detained community leader Ernesto Soto. According Alirio Garcia, a FENSUAGRO leader who spoke by phone from Tolima, Soto was arrested simply for carrying posters for the mobilization.

Since then, he said, the army has made it nearly impossible to get to the departmental capital of Ibaque, where many activities are planned. “Cars have been blocked by the army… in San Antonio, the people are there in the municipality, they were going move in these last few days and couldn’t. The state forces were letting any vehicle pass except those headed toward the mobilization… We have a quite delicate situation because they have the people blockaded in all the different municipalities, confiscating their food and supplies.”

After Soto’s arrest, the army began detaining young peasant and indigenous men at roadblocks to draft them into the military. Though military service is obligatory, many rural Colombians do not serve. Garcia called this “practically kidnapping by the military authorities,” though there are now reports that several of the young men have been released on the condition that they not attend the mobilization.

Nevertheless, Garcia said on Tuesday night that some 4,000 peasant farmers had reached Ibague by Tuesday and today have participated in various protest actions.

In the southern department of Putumayo, along the Ecuadorian border, social protests got a head start last week when a large group of peasant farmers took over a main road in Orito municipality, denouncing the crisis that stepped-up coca eradication has produced there since January. Putumayo has always been an epicenter of the drug war here, but 2007 seems to have been worse than ever.

On the morning of October 8, two days before the oficial start of the national mobilization, the mayor of Orito told the protesters that she was “receiving pressure to forcibly remove the peaceful concentration of peasant farmers.” That same afternoon, anti-narcotics and riot police along with counterinsurgency forces attacked, firing – according to organizers – tear-gas, rubber bullets and live rounds, and leaving a still-unknown number of people injured.

Nilia Quintero, an organizer from Putumayo working with the national mobilization, said by phone from the departmental capital of Mocoa on October 9 that “we have concentrated some 400 peasant farmers here, and we are awaiting the arrival of more tomorrow. Now we are calling on the departmental government to name a commission to investigate and resolve this.”

But despite all the repression from a government that has shown itself to be deeply afraid of its opponents, there is truly an explosion of both social protest occurring now all across this vast country. It is revealing not just the insatisfaction with the President Uribe, but just how united the rural social movement has become on a national level.

Stay tuned, because we will soon bring you updates on this peaceful uprising.

Source:
, Dan Feder / Thursday 11 October 2007 /
Español

Press groups concerned by killing of 3 newspaper vendors in southern Mexico

Published: October 11, 2007

MEXICO CITY: Human rights groups expressed concern Thursday that the killings earlier this week of three newspaper vendors in southern Oaxaca state may having a chilling effect on freedom of expression in Mexico.

Three vendors of the daily newspaper El Imparcial del Istmo were shot to death Monday as they rode in one of the company's vehicles, state officials in Oaxaca reported.

The National Center for Social Communication, or Cencos, quoted newspaper employees saying the killings may have come in retaliation for the paper's coverage of a mass grave where seven corpses were discovered earlier this year. Organized crime groups in Mexico often execute several victims and bury them together.

Imparcial editor Gonzalo Dominguez and crime reporter Felipe Ramos told the rights groups Cencos and Article 19 they believe the attack was aimed at them, but that the killers confused them with the vendors.

The two said they had received death threats prior to the Monday shootings. They and others had resigned their jobs out of fear for their safety.

Nobody answered calls to phone numbers listed for El Imparcial del Istmo to confirm the reports.

In a statement, the rights groups expressed their "profound concern, in light of these recent incidents highlighting the lack of safety for journalists in Mexico" and demanded that the government take the necessary measures to protect journalists.

Free press groups say Mexico has become one of the world's most dangerous places for journalists, with at least seven
killed across the country in the last year.

Source:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/12/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-Newspaper-Killings.php

More than 5,000 Patients Treated by Cuba's Health-Tourism Company


Havana, Oct 12 (ACN) More than 5,000 patients from 38 countries have received medical treatment in Cuba since September this year, at international clinics led by the government-run Cubanacan Tourism and Health Company.



In statements to ACN, Calixto Noche, commercial manager of the entity said in addition to the services provided to tourists, another 1,700 people, including foreign residents in Cuba and members of diplomatic missions have been treated in the clinics located throughout the country.

Calixto Noche said Cuba has contracts with nearly 40 countries, mostly in the American continent, except for the U.S, and including the Caribbean and Europe. He mentioned Canada, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Mexico, Chile, Bahamas, Jamaica, Portugal, France, Germany, Italy and Spain have relations with the company Cubanacan Tourism and Health gave medical treatment to nearly 9,000 foreigners in 2006 in the specialties of orthopaedics, general surgery, aesthetics, cardiology and paediatrics, noted the expert.

Since its opening in 1994, the Company offers visitors programs to improve their physical and mental conditions while enjoying their stay in Cuba. Cubanacan's medical services are part of the country's health infrastructure and of hotels and clinic networks in the main tourist areas.

The Cuban entity has a wide program specializing in three directions: prevention, treatment, and life quality, explained Noche.

Diseases such as vitiligo, psoriasis, alopecia and retinitis pigmentosa are among those most frequently treated.

Likewise, other programs are aimed at the restoration and rehabilitation of the neurological system, said the commercial expert. He noted that people suffering Parkinson, Alzheimer or Multiple Sclerosis have been able to recover the normal state of the nervous system thanks to methods applied at the clinics which have been proved efficient internationally.

California Becomes First State to Prohibit Landlords From Asking About Tenants' Immigration Status

October 12, 2007.

frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

Governor Schwarzenegger has just signed into law AB 976 by Assemblymember Charles Calderon that will prohibit cities and counties in California from enacting any local ordinances that compels a landlord to inquire, compile, report, or disclose any information about the citizenship or immigration status of a tenant or prospective tenant..

The bill also makes it illegal for any landlord under California state law to "Make any inquiry regarding or based on the immigration or citizenship status of a tenant, prospective tenant, occupant, or prospective occupant of residential rental property." California is the first in the nation to enact such a law.

“Cities do not have the authority to form their own foreign policy. Only the federal government can determine the legal status of any citizen,” Calderon stated. “Local ordinances like the one adopted by the City of Escondido place landlords under serious liability whether they comply with the ordinance or fail to comply with the ordinance. Landlords do not want to be immigration officers; they simply want to make a living.”

Calderon’s measure came in the wake of ordinances passed by cities in California and around the Untied States. The ordinances would have forced landlords to determine the citizenship status of their tenants and evict any tenant who is not a legal resident, or face fines and possible revocation of their business license. Such laws placed landlords in an impossible dilemma: comply with the city ordinance, while violating state and federal law or uphold state and federal law, facing sanctions from the cities. In every instance, however, Federal Judges issued restraining orders against the ordinances on the grounds that they violated constitutional due process and supremacy clauses.

The most recent instance of a court making a finding against these types of ordinances was on July 26th when a U.S. District Court Judge in Pennsylvania issued a decision finding Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s ordinance unconstitutional.

Last year, the City of Escondido adopted an ordinance that would have barred landlords from renting to undocumented immigrants and would have severely penalized landlords who failed to determine the immigration status of tenants and prospective tenants with fines and suspension of business licenses. The ordinance was immediately challenged in federal court by a coalition of civil rights groups on several constitutional grounds, as well as the federal preemption of immigration law, and enforcement of that law. On November 20, 2006, a temporary restraining order (TRO) was obtained against the Escondido ordinance from US District Judge Houston. Following the issuance of the TRO the City and plaintiffs entered into agreement that the ordinance would be rescinded and the city would pay $90,000 to those who brought suit to partially pay for their attorney fees.

Calderon told the committee, "Ordinances like Escondido City unfairly targets people of color. Landlords would target certain individuals that look like or talk like or conduct themselves in a manner that violates law and reason. The bill would clearly define the role of local government in this regard."

AB 976 had the support of a number of progressive groups and those concerned with protecting the rights of immigrants, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the California Labor Federation, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and the Western Center on Law and Poverty.

But it was sponsored by the Apartment Association of California Southern Cities (AACSC) and a number of other apartment owner groups lobbied for its passage and for the Governor to sign it. Landlords fearing potential liability for racial discrimination and other parts of playing the role of border agents, were the major backers of the bill.

Nevertheless, the measure passed the California State Assembly without a vote to spare, 41-25, and the State Senate 22-13 on straight party line votes with only Democrats in support and all votes against it by Republicans. In light of the court decisions, the absence of any major opposition, and the unity of the apartment owners and immigrant groups in support of AB 976, the lack of a single Republican vote for this measure shows how hard the immigration card is played in Republican politics in California, and Governor Schwarzenegger's break from his own party members on this bill.


SOURCE:

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/10/california_beco.html

Venezuela and Colombia inaugurate gas pipeline

Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:07pm BST
[-] Text [+]

BALLENAS, Colombia, Oct 12 (Reuters) - Venezuela and Colombia on Friday inaugurated a 140-mile (225-km) natural gas pipeline linking Colombian gas fields to Venezuela's gas-deficient western region.

The pipeline will transport 150 million cubic feet per day of natural gas to Venezuela to boost available supply for state oil company PDVSA and advance Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's regional energy integration efforts.

Chavez, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa met in Colombia's sweltering Guajira province near Venezuela's frontier for a symbolic opening of a valve to start the flow of gas.

"This is the integration we need," said Chavez in a speech following the inauguration.

U.S.-based Chevron Corp (CVX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Colombian state oil company Ecopetrol in May signed a sales contract with PDVSA to provide the natural gas from fields it operates jointly with Ecopetrol.

Western Venezuela suffers from a shortage of natural gas which restricts development of the nation's petrochemical industry, one of Chavez's top priorities.

It also forces some of PDVSA's facilities, such as the giant 960,000 barrel per day (bpd) Paraguana refining complex, to burn liquid fuels instead of cheaper natural gas.

Venezuela plans to import gas from Colombia for four to seven years and then reverse the flow so that Venezuela would export gas to Colombia as new projects come online.

Venezuelan authorities also plan to expand the line to Central America.

But one local analyst, who asked not to be named to avoid drawing his company into controversy, said PDVSA's ambitious plans for new petrochemical projects make it unlikely that it will be able to export to Colombia.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

CAFTA ratified by razor thin majority in Costa Rican elections

October 10, 2007

Protest electoral fraud
by Guerry Hoddersen

On October 7, Costa Ricans went to the polls to vote on the highly
disputed Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) with the U.S.
The day before the vote, the Bush administration issued a statement
saying it would not extend trade preferences to the country if voters
rejected the treaty. It was the last dirty trick in a long campaign by Bush
and his henchmen in Costa Rica--President Oscar Arias and U.S.
Ambassador Mark Langdale—to mislead and threaten Costa Rican voters.
With 96.3 percent of the vote counted, 51.6 percent of voters backed the
agreement while 48.4 percent opposed it. Voter turnout was 60 percent.
Rural areas voted more strongly against the measure than did the urban
centers. A manual recount of ballots began on Tuesday at the request of
anti-CAFTA forces.

Costa Rica is the first country where a free trade agreement has been put
to a public vote. The extremely narrow margin of victory shows that the
steam has gone out of the free trade engine. (Even the U.S. Congress
only approved CAFTA by a two-vote margin.) Furthermore, this election
has little legitimacy in the eyes of many Costa Ricans or anyone, for that
matter, who has followed this important fight.

Today the Costa Rican government and its U.S. corporate co-conspirators
are celebrating the spoils of their unethical and illegal campaign. A full
account of their tactics--including bribery, blackmail and fear—is found in
"CAFTA referendum in Costa Rica: Dirty tricks and repression
mount as vote nears,"
http://www.socialism.com/fsarticles/vol28no5/28511CAFTA.html.

After this article was published in the Freedom Socialist, a major scandal
broke out over an internal government memo that exposed a high level
campaign to manipulate the outcome of the election. In addition, managers
of public institutions like the National Security Institute brazenly erected
banners promoting a "yes" vote in blatant violation of prohibitions against
using public resources to sway the vote. At the same time, the Institute
imposed a gag order on public employees, teachers, and
university students.

Join them in contesting the outcome of this sham election. Write the head
of the Costa Rican Supreme Elections Tribunal and demand that the
results be invalidated because "yes" votes were obtained through illegal
means and in violation of election laws the tribunal is responsible
for upholding.


Send your letters or emails to:
Luis Antonio Sobrado Gonzalez, President
Tribunal Supremo Elecciones
Apartado Postal: 2163-1000
San José, Costa Rica
Email: sobrado@tse.go.cr
Please send a blind copy of your message to Guerry Hoddersen at
fspnatl@igc.org
___________________________________________________________