Saturday, October 13, 2007

Colombia’s Rural Social Movement Defies Government Intimidation and Comes Out to March

The Peasant-Farmer and Indigenous Mobilizations that Have Shaken the Country Since Yesterday Faced Intense Legal and Military Repression Before they Even Started
Laura del Castillo

In today’s zombie Colombia, made up of President Uribe’s friends and allies, everything seems to be right on track. It is a country of opportunities, where the government’s policy of “Democratic Security” has led to a time when there is no “armed conflict,” just a struggle against “terrorism.” Where there is nothing but smooth sailing ahead for the economy thanks to the high presence of foreign corporations. Where the country is free of paramilitaries because they have all demobilized and the drug war is hitting the traffickers where it hurts.

Nevertheless, on the other side – in that country that doesn’t figure among the pink-colored fantasies of Uribe’s activists – things are different, especially in rural areas. Most of the land is concentrated in the hands of big landowners, killings of rural leaders are again on the rise, the fumigations of illicit crops are destroying the food crops of the poor and affecting entire communities’ health, healthcare services are essentially privatized, and the “demobilized” paramilitaries have allied themselves with common criminals and now call themselves “Black Eagles” to sew terror in the most marginalized parts of the country. As they say, everything rises in that other part of the country: the cost of food, the cost of utilities, and, of course, the repression, because in a perfect country, no one contradicts the established order and protesting means committing a crime.

But a large part of that “other side” of the country is not staying silent. It is outraged and tired of enduring more than five years of attacks, humiliation and exclusion. That is why several diverse rural, indigenous, labor and student organizations in the country – who have come together to form the National Coordination of Agrarian and Popular Organizations of Colombia – began their National Agrarian and Popular Mobilization yesterday, with protest actions throughout the country. Marches, road blockades, office takeovers and land occupations are being carried out in villages, towns and cities.

During the weeks preceding the protest, the government unleashed an unprecedented wave of repression. Yes, that same democratic government (which supposedly respects the right to protest), amid its constant paranoia, has declared war on the mobilization. It has used many different strategies to demoralize the mobilization’s leaders and participants, including defamation, stigmatization, threats, unjustified arrests and murder. These attacks have made it clear that in Colombia, respect for differences and social protest is little more than a joke.

Protesting as a Crime
Since the first rumblings of the mobilization began to be heard, the government has waged a quiet war on the organizations involved. Organizers tried to keep plans secret for as long as possible, meeting infrequently in sites announced at the last minute. But by mid-September, the cat was out of the bag. On September 19, soldiers began distributing flyers and dropping them from the sky onto rural villages in Planadas, Tolima, about 200 miles southeast of Bogotá.

“Don’t participate in acts of terrorism,” the flyers read. “Don’t let them keep using you as cannon-fodder. Don’t go to the mobilization that the FARC is going to hold. Don’t become an accomplice to terrorists and murderers.”

Around the same time, say organizers, men identifying themselves as “Black Eagles” (the mysterious new extreme right-wing armed group that seems to be picking up where the now-demobilized United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, or AUC, left off) began appearing around the department, threatening punishment upon anyone who joined the planned protests.

But the first major blow came 10 days later, when agents of the DAS secret police, accompanied by dozens of armed soldiers, raided the offices of the Peasant Farmer Association of the Cimitarra River Valley (ACVC) and imprisoned three of its leaders. The ACVC is one of the most dynamic and powerful peasant organizations in the country. It has in the past rarely worked together with the National Federation of Agricultural Farming Unions (FENSUAGRO ), the agrarian workers’ union responsible for much of the mobilization’s organizing, and their collaboration on this has been something of a breakthrough for the rural social movement.

After the arrests, army chief General Mario Montoya Uribe appeared on television and spoke to local newspaper Vanguardia Liberal , announcing that the arrested men were FARC operatives and that he had 18 more similar warrants to serve. “We are investigating the behavior and conduct of many people,” he told the newspaper, “so there may be more people captured.” In the following days, residents of the nearby village of Yondó, Antioquia, reported the army was threatening to burn the houses of farmers who participated in the mobilization.

On October 2, in Cauca department – long a hotbed of indigenous and rural resistance – the local government declared that “in northern Cauca, the FARC have declared an armed stoppage, and those who participate in the mobilization will do so side-by-side with the Jacobo Arenas Mobile Column of the FARC.” Three days later, unidentified armed men took El Caraqueño village president Carlos Alberto Urbano off a bus and shot him in front of all the other passengers, including his wife and son.

Urbano died several days later while being transported to another hospital. Oscar Salazar, a community leader from La Vega, Cauca, and one of the national mobilization’s organizers, called him one of the mobilization’s “first victims” and saw the assassination as a clear paramilitary attack on the protest.

“We are social organizations, popular organizations, who are using our constitutional right to protest,” said Salazar. “But as it is a protest criticizing the Uribe regime, this is the way that they attack us, creating the conditions to annihilate the leaders and strike hard at the organizations and communities.”

The next day, back in Planadas, Tolima, soldiers detained community leader Ernesto Soto. According Alirio Garcia, a FENSUAGRO leader who spoke by phone from Tolima, Soto was arrested simply for carrying posters for the mobilization.

Since then, he said, the army has made it nearly impossible to get to the departmental capital of Ibaque, where many activities are planned. “Cars have been blocked by the army… in San Antonio, the people are there in the municipality, they were going move in these last few days and couldn’t. The state forces were letting any vehicle pass except those headed toward the mobilization… We have a quite delicate situation because they have the people blockaded in all the different municipalities, confiscating their food and supplies.”

After Soto’s arrest, the army began detaining young peasant and indigenous men at roadblocks to draft them into the military. Though military service is obligatory, many rural Colombians do not serve. Garcia called this “practically kidnapping by the military authorities,” though there are now reports that several of the young men have been released on the condition that they not attend the mobilization.

Nevertheless, Garcia said on Tuesday night that some 4,000 peasant farmers had reached Ibague by Tuesday and today have participated in various protest actions.

In the southern department of Putumayo, along the Ecuadorian border, social protests got a head start last week when a large group of peasant farmers took over a main road in Orito municipality, denouncing the crisis that stepped-up coca eradication has produced there since January. Putumayo has always been an epicenter of the drug war here, but 2007 seems to have been worse than ever.

On the morning of October 8, two days before the oficial start of the national mobilization, the mayor of Orito told the protesters that she was “receiving pressure to forcibly remove the peaceful concentration of peasant farmers.” That same afternoon, anti-narcotics and riot police along with counterinsurgency forces attacked, firing – according to organizers – tear-gas, rubber bullets and live rounds, and leaving a still-unknown number of people injured.

Nilia Quintero, an organizer from Putumayo working with the national mobilization, said by phone from the departmental capital of Mocoa on October 9 that “we have concentrated some 400 peasant farmers here, and we are awaiting the arrival of more tomorrow. Now we are calling on the departmental government to name a commission to investigate and resolve this.”

But despite all the repression from a government that has shown itself to be deeply afraid of its opponents, there is truly an explosion of both social protest occurring now all across this vast country. It is revealing not just the insatisfaction with the President Uribe, but just how united the rural social movement has become on a national level.

Stay tuned, because we will soon bring you updates on this peaceful uprising.

Source:
, Dan Feder / Thursday 11 October 2007 /
Español

Press groups concerned by killing of 3 newspaper vendors in southern Mexico

Published: October 11, 2007

MEXICO CITY: Human rights groups expressed concern Thursday that the killings earlier this week of three newspaper vendors in southern Oaxaca state may having a chilling effect on freedom of expression in Mexico.

Three vendors of the daily newspaper El Imparcial del Istmo were shot to death Monday as they rode in one of the company's vehicles, state officials in Oaxaca reported.

The National Center for Social Communication, or Cencos, quoted newspaper employees saying the killings may have come in retaliation for the paper's coverage of a mass grave where seven corpses were discovered earlier this year. Organized crime groups in Mexico often execute several victims and bury them together.

Imparcial editor Gonzalo Dominguez and crime reporter Felipe Ramos told the rights groups Cencos and Article 19 they believe the attack was aimed at them, but that the killers confused them with the vendors.

The two said they had received death threats prior to the Monday shootings. They and others had resigned their jobs out of fear for their safety.

Nobody answered calls to phone numbers listed for El Imparcial del Istmo to confirm the reports.

In a statement, the rights groups expressed their "profound concern, in light of these recent incidents highlighting the lack of safety for journalists in Mexico" and demanded that the government take the necessary measures to protect journalists.

Free press groups say Mexico has become one of the world's most dangerous places for journalists, with at least seven
killed across the country in the last year.

Source:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/12/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-Newspaper-Killings.php

More than 5,000 Patients Treated by Cuba's Health-Tourism Company


Havana, Oct 12 (ACN) More than 5,000 patients from 38 countries have received medical treatment in Cuba since September this year, at international clinics led by the government-run Cubanacan Tourism and Health Company.



In statements to ACN, Calixto Noche, commercial manager of the entity said in addition to the services provided to tourists, another 1,700 people, including foreign residents in Cuba and members of diplomatic missions have been treated in the clinics located throughout the country.

Calixto Noche said Cuba has contracts with nearly 40 countries, mostly in the American continent, except for the U.S, and including the Caribbean and Europe. He mentioned Canada, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Mexico, Chile, Bahamas, Jamaica, Portugal, France, Germany, Italy and Spain have relations with the company Cubanacan Tourism and Health gave medical treatment to nearly 9,000 foreigners in 2006 in the specialties of orthopaedics, general surgery, aesthetics, cardiology and paediatrics, noted the expert.

Since its opening in 1994, the Company offers visitors programs to improve their physical and mental conditions while enjoying their stay in Cuba. Cubanacan's medical services are part of the country's health infrastructure and of hotels and clinic networks in the main tourist areas.

The Cuban entity has a wide program specializing in three directions: prevention, treatment, and life quality, explained Noche.

Diseases such as vitiligo, psoriasis, alopecia and retinitis pigmentosa are among those most frequently treated.

Likewise, other programs are aimed at the restoration and rehabilitation of the neurological system, said the commercial expert. He noted that people suffering Parkinson, Alzheimer or Multiple Sclerosis have been able to recover the normal state of the nervous system thanks to methods applied at the clinics which have been proved efficient internationally.

California Becomes First State to Prohibit Landlords From Asking About Tenants' Immigration Status

October 12, 2007.

frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

Governor Schwarzenegger has just signed into law AB 976 by Assemblymember Charles Calderon that will prohibit cities and counties in California from enacting any local ordinances that compels a landlord to inquire, compile, report, or disclose any information about the citizenship or immigration status of a tenant or prospective tenant..

The bill also makes it illegal for any landlord under California state law to "Make any inquiry regarding or based on the immigration or citizenship status of a tenant, prospective tenant, occupant, or prospective occupant of residential rental property." California is the first in the nation to enact such a law.

“Cities do not have the authority to form their own foreign policy. Only the federal government can determine the legal status of any citizen,” Calderon stated. “Local ordinances like the one adopted by the City of Escondido place landlords under serious liability whether they comply with the ordinance or fail to comply with the ordinance. Landlords do not want to be immigration officers; they simply want to make a living.”

Calderon’s measure came in the wake of ordinances passed by cities in California and around the Untied States. The ordinances would have forced landlords to determine the citizenship status of their tenants and evict any tenant who is not a legal resident, or face fines and possible revocation of their business license. Such laws placed landlords in an impossible dilemma: comply with the city ordinance, while violating state and federal law or uphold state and federal law, facing sanctions from the cities. In every instance, however, Federal Judges issued restraining orders against the ordinances on the grounds that they violated constitutional due process and supremacy clauses.

The most recent instance of a court making a finding against these types of ordinances was on July 26th when a U.S. District Court Judge in Pennsylvania issued a decision finding Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s ordinance unconstitutional.

Last year, the City of Escondido adopted an ordinance that would have barred landlords from renting to undocumented immigrants and would have severely penalized landlords who failed to determine the immigration status of tenants and prospective tenants with fines and suspension of business licenses. The ordinance was immediately challenged in federal court by a coalition of civil rights groups on several constitutional grounds, as well as the federal preemption of immigration law, and enforcement of that law. On November 20, 2006, a temporary restraining order (TRO) was obtained against the Escondido ordinance from US District Judge Houston. Following the issuance of the TRO the City and plaintiffs entered into agreement that the ordinance would be rescinded and the city would pay $90,000 to those who brought suit to partially pay for their attorney fees.

Calderon told the committee, "Ordinances like Escondido City unfairly targets people of color. Landlords would target certain individuals that look like or talk like or conduct themselves in a manner that violates law and reason. The bill would clearly define the role of local government in this regard."

AB 976 had the support of a number of progressive groups and those concerned with protecting the rights of immigrants, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the California Labor Federation, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and the Western Center on Law and Poverty.

But it was sponsored by the Apartment Association of California Southern Cities (AACSC) and a number of other apartment owner groups lobbied for its passage and for the Governor to sign it. Landlords fearing potential liability for racial discrimination and other parts of playing the role of border agents, were the major backers of the bill.

Nevertheless, the measure passed the California State Assembly without a vote to spare, 41-25, and the State Senate 22-13 on straight party line votes with only Democrats in support and all votes against it by Republicans. In light of the court decisions, the absence of any major opposition, and the unity of the apartment owners and immigrant groups in support of AB 976, the lack of a single Republican vote for this measure shows how hard the immigration card is played in Republican politics in California, and Governor Schwarzenegger's break from his own party members on this bill.


SOURCE:

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2007/10/california_beco.html

Venezuela and Colombia inaugurate gas pipeline

Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:07pm BST
[-] Text [+]

BALLENAS, Colombia, Oct 12 (Reuters) - Venezuela and Colombia on Friday inaugurated a 140-mile (225-km) natural gas pipeline linking Colombian gas fields to Venezuela's gas-deficient western region.

The pipeline will transport 150 million cubic feet per day of natural gas to Venezuela to boost available supply for state oil company PDVSA and advance Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's regional energy integration efforts.

Chavez, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe and Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa met in Colombia's sweltering Guajira province near Venezuela's frontier for a symbolic opening of a valve to start the flow of gas.

"This is the integration we need," said Chavez in a speech following the inauguration.

U.S.-based Chevron Corp (CVX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Colombian state oil company Ecopetrol in May signed a sales contract with PDVSA to provide the natural gas from fields it operates jointly with Ecopetrol.

Western Venezuela suffers from a shortage of natural gas which restricts development of the nation's petrochemical industry, one of Chavez's top priorities.

It also forces some of PDVSA's facilities, such as the giant 960,000 barrel per day (bpd) Paraguana refining complex, to burn liquid fuels instead of cheaper natural gas.

Venezuela plans to import gas from Colombia for four to seven years and then reverse the flow so that Venezuela would export gas to Colombia as new projects come online.

Venezuelan authorities also plan to expand the line to Central America.

But one local analyst, who asked not to be named to avoid drawing his company into controversy, said PDVSA's ambitious plans for new petrochemical projects make it unlikely that it will be able to export to Colombia.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

CAFTA ratified by razor thin majority in Costa Rican elections

October 10, 2007

Protest electoral fraud
by Guerry Hoddersen

On October 7, Costa Ricans went to the polls to vote on the highly
disputed Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) with the U.S.
The day before the vote, the Bush administration issued a statement
saying it would not extend trade preferences to the country if voters
rejected the treaty. It was the last dirty trick in a long campaign by Bush
and his henchmen in Costa Rica--President Oscar Arias and U.S.
Ambassador Mark Langdale—to mislead and threaten Costa Rican voters.
With 96.3 percent of the vote counted, 51.6 percent of voters backed the
agreement while 48.4 percent opposed it. Voter turnout was 60 percent.
Rural areas voted more strongly against the measure than did the urban
centers. A manual recount of ballots began on Tuesday at the request of
anti-CAFTA forces.

Costa Rica is the first country where a free trade agreement has been put
to a public vote. The extremely narrow margin of victory shows that the
steam has gone out of the free trade engine. (Even the U.S. Congress
only approved CAFTA by a two-vote margin.) Furthermore, this election
has little legitimacy in the eyes of many Costa Ricans or anyone, for that
matter, who has followed this important fight.

Today the Costa Rican government and its U.S. corporate co-conspirators
are celebrating the spoils of their unethical and illegal campaign. A full
account of their tactics--including bribery, blackmail and fear—is found in
"CAFTA referendum in Costa Rica: Dirty tricks and repression
mount as vote nears,"
http://www.socialism.com/fsarticles/vol28no5/28511CAFTA.html.

After this article was published in the Freedom Socialist, a major scandal
broke out over an internal government memo that exposed a high level
campaign to manipulate the outcome of the election. In addition, managers
of public institutions like the National Security Institute brazenly erected
banners promoting a "yes" vote in blatant violation of prohibitions against
using public resources to sway the vote. At the same time, the Institute
imposed a gag order on public employees, teachers, and
university students.

Join them in contesting the outcome of this sham election. Write the head
of the Costa Rican Supreme Elections Tribunal and demand that the
results be invalidated because "yes" votes were obtained through illegal
means and in violation of election laws the tribunal is responsible
for upholding.


Send your letters or emails to:
Luis Antonio Sobrado Gonzalez, President
Tribunal Supremo Elecciones
Apartado Postal: 2163-1000
San José, Costa Rica
Email: sobrado@tse.go.cr
Please send a blind copy of your message to Guerry Hoddersen at
fspnatl@igc.org
___________________________________________________________

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Mayans in Guatemala: No compromise, halt mining

By Brenda Norrell,
Posted on Sun Sep 30th, 2007 at 01:20:32 PM EST
Sipakapa is not for sale, Mayan community turned down corporate mining cash

TUCSON, Ariz. – Gold and silver mining in the Mayan homelands in northern Guatemala, near the border with Chiapas, Mexico, is poisoning the water and explosives are destroying the homes in the rural farming community of Sipakapa, Guatemala.

“While the gold mine is there and operating, there is no solution. The only solution is to stop the mining,” said Mario Tema, Mayan from Sipakapa, during an interview at the Western Mining Action Network Conference in Tucson on Sept. 29.

Goldcorp (formerly Glamis Gold) is mining silver and gold at the open-pit Marlin Mine, between two Mayan communities, Sipakapa and San Miguel Ixtahuacan in the San Marcos highlands.

Speaking through a translator, Tema said, “There is a new mine in Guatemala. It is the first of its kind. It has created many problems in our community, especially social problems.

“The government is supporting the mine politically. It makes our organizing very difficult, because it means people are speaking out not just against the mine, but against the government.”

Tema said the mine has been in operation for two years and is causing impacts, both environmental and social impacts.

“We know there is acid mine drainage in the river. There are heavy metals in the river near one mine site. There are also social impacts from the explosives. People are living 500 meters from the explosives used at the mine and there are cracks in their houses. Now, their roofs are leaking. Seventy-two homes have been damaged. We’re talking about 72 families, with an average of six people in each family.”

“The mining company must take responsibility for helping them repair their homes.”

Tema points out there are 22 different Mayan languages in the region. The mine will not just harm the Sipakapense speaking Mayans in Sipakapa and Mam speaking Mayans in San Miguel, but will affect the entire western highlands region of Guatemala now targeted as a mining district.

MineWatch Canada reports that promoters of the mining industry -- the World Bank, Glamis Gold (now Goldcorp) and the governments of Guatemala, Canada and the United States -- promoted the Marlin mine as a "development" project. In reality, however, the mine is simply a business that enriches an international corporation at the expense of the good development of communities.

After the World Bank’s $45 million loan to Glamis, the government of Guatemala began militarization and repression. On January 11, 2005, the government sent more 1,200 soldiers and 400 police agents to Los Encuentros, Sololá, to protect the passage of a cylinder destined for the Marlin Mine. The State forces used tear gas and bullets against the Kaqchikel brothers and sisters who for weeks had been detaining the transportation of the cylinder in protest. Raúl Castro Bocel was murdered by State security forces and more than 20 were injured.

The gold mining company brought in an Israeli security company, which killed one of the people. In San Miguel Ixtahuacán, on March 23, 2005, an employee of the private Israeli security company hired by Glamis Gold, the Golan Group, shot and killed Alvaro Benigno Sánchez, leaving four children without their father.

In Tucson, Tema said the people in his community of Sipakapa have responded with consultation and an overwhelming “No” vote to mining.

“People are also in conflict with their local authorities. The opposition has taken the form of organizing community consultation. Community members were asked to respond, ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ on the issue of mining. The people said ‘No.’”

“But the mining companies try to divide the people. It is always generating more conflict in our community."

In Tema’s community, there are 15,000 people and 92 percent are Mayans, with 8 percent of mixed ancestry. There is no commercial industry and people survive from family farms. Some have cows, but no more than six.

In Tucson, Tema said the benefit of attending the Western Mining Action Network Conference came from sharing with other people impacted by mining and discovering how they are working to halt mining. He particularly learned a great deal from Western Shoshone Carrie Dann, leading the fight for Western Shoshone land rights as corporations seize Shoshone territory in Nevada for nuclear testing and gold mining.

Meanwhile, in Guatemala, elections have been underway. Tema said candidates from the civic committee, born out of resistance to mining, did well in municipal elections. The newly elected officials take office January 15, 2008, for a period of four years.

“We have municipal support. We can make decisions and continue to resist this mining project. We can start to make laws and regulations to protect our territories,” Tema said.

“We can engage in our strength in a legal and political way. We have public power in our hands. We have ‘people power’ to work for the benefit of the people in the community.”

Although activist Rigoberta Menchu did not receive enough votes to remain in the race for President of Guatemala, her effort was celebrated.

“For any Indigenous person to stand up and run for president, it is important. We need to pay attention to it,” Tema said.

“In the case of Rigoberta Menchu, it is an historic event. There has not been an Indigenous person running for president since the establishment of the national government in 1821. There has never been an Indigenous person running for President of Guatemala.”

Meanwhile, MiningWatch Canada reports that the Marlin silver-gold mine was discovered by Francisco Gold and developed by Glamis Gold, through its fully owned subsidiary Montana Exploradora de Guatemala. There has been serious and prolonged protest by Mayan villages in the San Miguel Ixtahuacan, which comprises 19 villages, and Sipacapa, which comprises 13 villages, in Guatemala’s highlands department of San Marcos.

Over the past two years, villages in San Miguel Ixtahuacan have been transformed into an open pit mine, which will eventually encompass five square kilometers. Eighty-five percent of the total expanse of the mine is in San Miguel Ixtahuacan and 15 percent is in Sipacapa.

The municipality of San Miguel Ixtahuacan has a population of 39,000, most of whom are Mam Maya farmers who depend on farming to survive. Before production at the mine began, there were numerous protests.

In 2006, Goldcorp predecessor Glamis paid for workers from its Marlin Mine to participate in pro-mining demonstrations.

Two years ago, when residents of Sipacapa heard about the mine, they organized a referendum (Consulta) using the International Labour Organization’s Convention 169, which affirms the right of Indigenous communities to be consulted in good faith before industrial activity take place on their lands. The people of Sipacapa voted overwhelming against the mine.

Montana Exploradora de Guatemala filed an unconstitutionality suit, as well as an appeal, against the Consulta in 2005. On May 8, 2007, the Guatemalan Constitutional Court ruled that the Consulta was unconstitutional.

In early 2007, the company offered the municipality a “gift,” of $150,000 CDN. It was refused.

--Goldcorp mining in Indigenous territories in the Americas

Goldcorp has gold mining interests in Indigenous territories, including mines in Canada (Red Lake Complex in northwestern Ontario; Musslewhite in Ontario and Porcupine in northeastern Ontario.)

Goldcorp mining interests include mines in Argentina (Bajo de la Alumbrera), Australia (Peak Gold Mine), Brazil (Amapari mine in the northern state of Anapa), Chile (La Coipa gold and silver mine) Guatemala (Marlin Mine and Cerro Blanco), Dominican Republic (Pueblo Viejo) and Honduras (San Martin Mine.)

In Mexico, Goldcorp’s interest include Los Filos/Bermejal and Nukay mines, both in the state of Guerrero, El Sauzal in Chihuahua in the northern state and Penasquito in Zacatecas.

In the United States, Goldcorp has 66.7 percent interest in the Glamis Marigold Mining Company in Humboldt County, Nevada. Goldcorp owns Wharf open pit gold mine in the Bald Mountain mining district of South Dakota.

The Imperial Project is a proposed open pit gold mining operation in the Imperial Valley in southern California. The Quechan Nation is battling Goldcorp/Glamis Gold over the proposed open pit cyanide leaching gold operation, which would violate their sacred Spirit Trail and a wilderness area.

Please see first in series: "Peru’s Indigenous Peoples arise in defense of Earth from mining"

http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com/